Skip to content

GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269

Marsoni M251S
Sale price$175.80
Pay 4 payments of $43.95 a month.Shop Pay
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29
GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269GARDLOC PTO Shaft (Lz) Length: 1210mm, 1 3 8'' x 6 Spline Q. R. to 1 3 8'' x 6 Spline Q. R. Sparex Part No. S. 166269 Product Specifications HP Rating @ 540RPM 90HP, German Series AW36 W2500. Alternative to 39018, 164269 Brand GARDLOC German Series AW36 W2500 Grease Coupler Central Grease Nipple Guard Type Gardloc HP Rating @ 540RPM 90 HP Rating Range @ 540RPM 55 to 119 Implement End 1 3 8'' x 6 Spline Q. R. Kilowatt Power Rating @ 540RPM 66 Lz Length
Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

  • Standard: 3-7 business days
  • Fast: 2-3 business days
  • Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for GARDLOC PTO Shaft - (Lz) Length: 1210 MM, 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. to 1 3/8in X 6 Spline Q.r. - Sparex Part S.166269 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 2412 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
ACifuentes
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 1
Cheap
Size: 34W x 32L, Color: Stone Medium Wash
The fit is pretty terrible. Bunchy in the crotch. Lack of inseam lengths so they can be either too long or too short depending on your height. I would have rated these a 3 overall because they are what you pay for. Passable cheap jeans, but honestly you're better off shopping cheap department store jeans. I give it a one for durability. Only a handful of wears since September and they've torn at the stitching under the zipper just after a very light lunge. Buyer beware .
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Andy Vargas
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 3
they claim to be stretchy but are not.
Size: 38W x 32L, Color: Stone Medium Wash
they don't stretch, but nice jeans if you're looking for non stretch jeans.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Juan Bustamante
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 4
Can't beat it!
Size: 30W x 34L, Color: Black-heavyweight
These pants are a little to snug on waist but i only really notice this problem on black jeans regardless of brand, other than that These a verry comfy zipper work well haven't had any issues I wear these once a week so obviously I wash them once a week, color hasnt faded much at all. Compared to levi I think amazon has them beat in Price, Quality, Durability, Color Fading. You cant go wrong with these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Albert Houle
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Good fit
Size: 33W x 28L, Color: Rinse
Good value
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Chris Cross
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Loose fit
Size: 40W x 32L, Color: Stone Medium Wash
They were a little larger than I thought, but one size below didn't fit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products