Skip to content

RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version)

Marsoni M251S
Sale price$58.99
Pay 4 payments of $14.75 a month.Shop Pay
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29
RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version)RFM5137 'Standard' version of the Rye Field King Tiger kit RFM5137 5138 Common Specifications: Torsion bars are movable Recoil mechanism is reproduced using the included spring Includes decals (with 4 marking options), photo etched parts, metal gun barrel, and spring You can select one of the 4 types of drive wheel teeth for assembly Tracks are movable after assembly Includes 3D printed muzzle brake
Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version) orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

  • Standard: 3-7 business days
  • Fast: 2-3 business days
  • Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version) ships.

Need Help?
Questions about RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version), sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for RFM: 1/35 Sd.Kfz. 182 Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.B German King Tiger Ardennes 1944 (Standard Version) in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1201 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
N
Verified Purchase
Nathan
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 3
Poorly written, but possibly best of all the garbage available today.
Format: Paperback
E&E's (including torts) are of questionable value except as an introduction to ideas and terms. The actual examples and explanations are at times self-contradictory, especially regarding the certainty of the authors in how a court would rule. I would not recommend these books to anyone going to law school if there were something better available. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with anything better at this point. Read the whole first-year series before law school if you can't find a better series.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2023
W
Verified Purchase
Will
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 3
I don't understand the Hype.
Format: Paperback
Everyone seems to love Glannon but I found other E&Es to me much straightforward and easy to understand. Don't know what it is about Glannon's writing. Not terrible, just not conducive to me for whatever reason. Negligence sections were lacking.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2022
C
Verified Purchase
Chris Dan
Draper, US
★★★★★ 1
Garbage. Order from a REAL bookstore or publisher
Format: Paperback
Book came cut off and assembled UPSIDE DOWN wtf is this?? Definitely demanding a refund. This is straight up GARBAGE should've just bought from b&n
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2022
D
Verified Purchase
Danny
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 1
Came used with dirty pages
Format: Paperback
The book clearly is not new, the pages are folded over and dirty with dirt. There is a sticky residue on the back cover of the book. Really gross.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2021
M
Verified Purchase
Michaela Coder
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Best E&E out there
Format: Paperback
This is the best E&E book out there! Helped me a ton in Torts and I owe my A in Torts to this book. There's a whole section on how to write a torts exam and the examples & explanation sections are AMAZING and really detailed. The best sections are on factual/actual cause and proximate cause and the nuances between the two.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2025

recommand products